From the perspective of the clinician, especially the paediatrici

From the perspective of the clinician, especially the paediatrician, the eradication of the meningococcus is a highly attractive concept [32]. Meningococcal disease is a sudden onset and very severe syndrome, principally affecting the very young, and an infected individual can deteriorate see more from being apparently perfectly

healthy to presenting a medical emergency in a matter of a few hours. Even in countries with access to state-of-the-art medical facilities children still die when the race between diagnosis and treatment and bacterial growth in the blood stream and/or cerebro spinal fluid and is lost [33]. Individuals who survive frequently suffer debilitating sequelae, further magnifying the impact of this much-feared disease, even when disease rates are relatively low [34]. In resource Cabozantinib supplier poor settings, the impact of the disease is even greater, especially the meningitis belt of

Africa, which experiences large-scale epidemic outbreaks of meningococcal meningitis [9]. These outbreaks represent the highest burden of meningococcal disease worldwide. They occur periodically, slightly more often than once a decade, over a period of 5–6 weeks in the dry season during the period of the trade wind, the Harmattan. In addition to causing tens of thousands of case and hundreds or thousands of deaths, these outbreaks are very disruptive, overwhelming healthcare systems for their duration [35]. On the balance of the evidence currently available, the eradication of the meningococcus per se is not desirable, even if it were achievable, which appears unlikely with current or foreseeable technology. As most infections with

the meningococcus are harmless to the human host, deliberately removing a common component of the commensal microbiota could have consequences that are not easily anticipated, for example the exploitation of the vacated niche by other, more harmful, organisms leading to the increase similar or different pathologies. A further risk of targeting all meningococci indiscriminately is that this may well be only partially below successful and could lead to the elimination of normally harmless meningococci, resulting in the paradoxical rise in disease as passive and active protection accorded to the host population by the carriage of these organisms is lost. Indiscriminate intervention in a system that we do not understand is unwise. Public health interventions are more appropriately targeted to the control of the disease, rather than the eradication of the meningococcal population as a whole. This is a much more achievable goal, with fewer possible negative consequences. As the great majority of invasive meningococci are encapsulated, with most disease caused by a few serogroups, only bacteria expressing these capsular polysaccharides need be targeted.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>