In this study, two influenza viruses were isolated from pigs. A phylogenetic analysis showed that the A/swine/NanChang/F9/2010(H1N1) (F9/10) strain shared a high degree of homology with the pandemic H1N1/2009 virus, and A/swine/GuangDong/34/2006 (H1N1) (34/06) strains was a classical swine influenza virus. A proteomic analysis was performed to investigate possible alterations of protein expression in porcine alveolar macrophage (PAM) cells infected by the F9/10 and 34/06 viruses over different time courses. Using 2-DE in association with MALDI-TOF MS/MS,
we identified 13 up-regulated and 21 down-regulated protein spots, including cytoskeleton proteins, cellular signal transduction proteins, molecular biosynthesis proteins and heat shock proteins. The most significant changes in the infected cells were associated with molecular biosynthesis proteins and heat shock proteins. We analysed the biological characteristics of the F9/10 and 34/06 viruses LDN-193189 mouse in vivo and in vitro. The F9/10 virus showed greater A-1155463 chemical structure pathogenicity than the 34/06 virus in PAM cells and mice. This study provides insights into
the biologic characteristics, potential virulence alteration and cross-species transmission mechanisms of the pandemic H1N1/2009. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Background: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels are crucial for managing chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It was unclear whether Daan real-time polymerase chain reaction test (Daan test) or COBAS TaqMan HBV DNA Test (Cobas TaqMan) was superior in measuring different HBV DNA levels in clinical specimens.\n\nMethods: We Repotrectinib in vivo enrolled 67 treatment-naive, HBV surface antigen-positive CHB patients (high baseline viral levels) who received either lamivudine/adefovir or entecavir. Serum samples were tested at baseline and treatment week 24 using the Daan test and Cobas TaqMan.\n\nResults: In the 67-baseline samples, the HBV DNA levels with the Cobas TaqMan (7.90 +/- 0.73 log(10) IU/mL) were significantly greater than those of the Daan test (7.11 +/- 0.44 log(10) IU/mL; P < 0.001). Of
the 67 24-week samples (low viral levels), the Cobas TaqMan detected 59 (88.1%; 8 undetected); the Daan test detected 33 (49.3%; 34 undetected; P < 0.001). The Cobas TaqMan detected HBV DNA in 26 of 34 samples undetectable by the Daan test (range, 1.4-3.7 log(10) IU/mL) or 38% of samples (26/67). The reductions in viral load after 24 weeks of oral antiviral treatment in the 33 samples that were positive for both the Daan test and the Cobas TaqMan test were significantly different (3.59 +/- 1.11 log(10) IU/mL versus 4.87 +/- 1.58 log(10) IU/mL, respectively; P = 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis showed positive correlation between results from two tests (r(p) = 0.602, P<0.001). The HBV genotypes and the anti-viral treatment did not affect the measurements of the HBV DNA by the Daan assay and the Cobas Taqman assay.