50). In 106 incidences of aggression recorded, 82% of interactions involved a single colony member interacting with the stimulus subject. Both
sexes were equally likely to interact with stimulus subjects: sex ratio of individuals investigating (1) colony R428 member stimulus subjects: 27 females : 23 males; (2) stranger stimulus subjects: 29 females : 27 males. Season × treatment (F1, 18 = 8.03, P = 0.011) was a significant predictor of agonistic interactions when apple was introduced into colonies. Post hoc tests showed that aggression was highest for apple in winter compared with other treatments (Fig. 3). Agonistic interactions consisted mainly of one individual chasing another colony member away from the food. No damaging fights were recorded. Approximately 10% of the apple was consumed aboveground in winter, and all of the remaining food (apple and plants) was carried belowground. Y-27632 in vitro Ice rats consumed and hoarded about 40% of the apple when fresh natural vegetation was abundant in summer; introduced plants were not consumed. Ice rats resumed other activities (including mutual avoidance) after the food was consumed or hoarded. We investigated home-range size and social behaviour of an African alpine rodent, evaluating several functional hypotheses. Because the burrow is a shared resource, we predicted that ice rat colony members would be amicable and/or have reduced
aggression (social tolerance) aboveground, as occurs in mulgara Dasycercus blythi (Körtner, Pavey & Geiser, 2007). However, ice rats of both sexes avoided colony members, and contact was characterized by aggression more often than amicability.
Such spatial organization and social behaviour were 上海皓元医药股份有限公司 consistent between seasons. The potential for aggression possibly results in mutual avoidance between conspecifics (Shier & Randall, 2004). Therefore, the limited occurrence of agonistic interactions within an ice rat colony cannot be used to infer the degree of sociality. Ice rats sharing a burrow system were suspected to be a family group of a founding pair and non-reproductive offspring (Willan, 1990). However, we found that colonies comprised several adult males and females. Although kinship was unknown, all adults were reproductively active in summer, indicating plural breeding. Multi-male and multi-female social groups occur in Gunnison’s prairie dog Cynomys gunnisoni, in which resource availability, not mating strategy, drives sociality (Verdolin, 2007). Therefore, while ice rats may be constrained by their investment in a burrow system, which requires constant maintenance (Schwaibold & Pillay, 2006), our results are consistent with those of other rodents (e.g. lesser cavies Microcavia australis; Taraborelli, 2009) that communal burrowing is unlikely to be the sole driver of sociality.