Since the confidence interval should be representative, it was calculated separately for the sediment collected from the beach, surf zone (0.9–6 m depth) and the deeper nearshore (7 m and 10 m depths) (Table 3, Figure 7). Values within the limits of the confidence interval of four, check details three or two grain-size indices (balanced environment, symbols 01, 02 and 03) were observed in 80% of the samples (Table 3, Figure

7). In the study area, there were no samples indicating deposition in four or three grain-size indices (Table 3). Deposition for two indices was observed in 6.8% of the samples, located in the surf zone (profiles 6mv–1mv, 8a–10a, 4a, Figure 7) and on the coast (profile 5a, Figure 7). Erosion (symbols R1, R2, R3, R4, Table 3, Figure 7) was observed in 13.2% of the samples, located along the lower coast (profiles 3p–13p, 5mv–3mv and 4a, 6a, Figure 7), in the troughs between longshore bars (profiles 8a–2a, Figure 7), near the Strait of Baltiysk at depths of 0.9–7 m (profiles 3p–5p and 6a, Figure 7) and on the 10 m deep slope (profiles 3p and 3mv, Figure 7). The dynamics of the sediment, indicated on the basis of the Passega diagram, decrease from the swash and surf zones (depth of 30 cm and troughs),

where material is transported by rolling and sliding with high dynamics and local turbulence, towards the deeper flat slope, where fractional transport in the suspended load is dominant (Figure 7). The exception is the area adjacent to the Palbociclib in vitro Strait of Baltiysk, which has a dynamic environment and a bed load deficit (Figure 7). According to the Hjulström diagram, the critical erosive velocities of currents differ significantly along and across the study area. Along the low coast and the surf zone, currents of 18 cm s−1 initiate large-scale transport of bed material (Figure 7). However, in the troughs and along the swash zone total redeposition begins at velocities >20 cm s−1 (Figure 7). Along the deeper nearshore, between profiles 4mv and 10a, critical velocities increase

from 18 cm s−1 to 19–20 cm s−1 (Figure 7). To the north-east of profile 4mv, at the depth of 10 m, an inverse, decreasing, trend to why 17–18 cm s−1 is observed (Figure 7). This phenomenon is due more to the cohesion of the surficial layer of sediment than to the grain size, and indicates lower erosive resistance. The open-sea coast of the Vistula Spit consists of erosive and accumulative stretches (Zawadzka-Kahlau 1999, Boldyrev & Bobykina 2001, Bobykina & Karmanov 2009). Depending on the shore’s exposure to windgenerated waves, some of those stretches are relatively stable while others are changeable. Boldyrev & Bobykina (2001), Chechko et al. (2008) and Bobykina & Karmanov (2009) indicated a stable erosive trend of the coastal zone located near the western pier of the Strait of Baltiysk with a rate of 0.8–4 m year−1 (Bobykina & Karmanov 2009).