The description of the impact of uniform and standardized data for database curation, the development of modeling algorithms and for the interlaboratory data exchange may underline all arguments that support the adoption of standards by the scientific community for implementation in its daily research routine. Examples of standards for basic and applied enzyme research as well as suggestions for quality assessment tools in the publication process complete this collection of articles. Both editors

and authors hope that this collection will help students and teachers to raise awareness of the existence and the advantage of standards for conducting research and reporting data. The adoption and acceptance of standards is a mid-term project, and IDH tumor includes the need to convince a wide range of people concerned that a potential small — trivial, even — loss of academic freedom will

be replaced by substantial gain in the generation of scientific knowledge. We have tried to cover all of the appropriate topics, but there will probably be some omissions that will need to be dealt with in the future, either because we did not think of them, or because we were unable to persuade suitable authors to participate, and we shall appreciate it if readers will draw our attention to these. Experience with commissions that make recommendations tells us that nothing is ever definitive and there are always revisions MycoClean Mycoplasma Removal Kit to be made.

To avoid giving the impression that we regard some contributions as more important than selleck chemicals others, we shall mention the different articles in alphabetical order of their authors. First, therefore, is the treatment of aspects of particular importance for high-throughput screening, described by Michael Acker and Douglas Auld. The requirements for more classical enzyme assays are described by Hans Bisswanger. Athel Cornish-Bowden discusses the analysis of enzyme kinetic data, in particular the statistical analysis of data, and in a separate article, describes the IUBMB recommendations on enzyme kinetics—which are now rather old and in some respects in urgent need of updating—together with the IUBMB system for classifying enzyme-catalysed reactions, which, in contrast, is kept continuously up-to-date. Kevin Francis and Amnon Kohen discuss the analysis of kinetic isotope effects. Robert Goldberg describes the application of standards in thermodynamics to enzyme data. Peter Halling and Munishwar Gupta deal with standards for application to industrial biocatalysis. Masaaki Kotera, Susumu Goto and Minoru Kanehisa describe how databases such as KEGG can be used predictively for genome and metabolome studies. Octavio Monasterio deals with the use of nuclear magnetic resonance for studying enzyme catalysis. Ida Schomburg, Antje Chang and Dietmar Schomburg discuss standardization in enzymology in the context of the BRENDA database.