There is no systematic mechanism for providing information about

There is no systematic mechanism for providing information about CRC risk for family members of those diagnosed with the disease. Therefore, it often falls to general practitioners (GPs) to assess risk and provide screening recommendations as part of preventive care. Our recent data indicate that being asked by a health professional about their family history of CRC was a significant

predictor of being screened in accordance to guidelines among FDRs [6]. However, there is limited evidence that this does not routinely occur in clinical practice. In a survey of community dwelling Australians aged over 50, 38% reported ever being asked about their family history of CRC by a health professional [7]. A study in North America of patients with CRC who had a first or second degree relative affected reported 59% having a family history documented selleck chemicals llc [8]. An audit of medical records in Ku-0059436 purchase a North American family practice found 55% recorded a family history of cancer while only 8% recorded age of onset [9]. A similar study in a UK hospital involving patients diagnosed with CRC under age 60 found 54% of case notes referenced family history of cancer and 20% included the age of diagnosis

of family members [10]. In this study we examine the factors that are associated with discussing family history of CRC with a health professional. Prior research has shown that a recent family cancer event

is most commonly the motivator for a FDR to visit their GP [11] and [12], with level of education also predictive in influencing health maintenance visits [13]. The aim of the current project was to: (1) describe the proportion of FDRs who report discussing family history of CRC with a health professional; (2) how and when they became aware of family history as a risk factor; and (3) identify whether older age, female gender, country of birth, education, greater family risk status, worry about getting bowel cancer, or how became aware of increased risk is associated with greater likelihood of having discussed family risk with Dichloromethane dehalogenase a health professionals. FDRs of people with CRC were eligible to participate in the trial if they were: (1) aged 18 or older; (2) English speaking; (3) able to provide informed consent; and (4) did not have a prior diagnosis of CRC, advanced adenoma, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), or Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or other inflammatory bowel disease. Data for this study were collected between February 2010 and November 2012. CRC patients were identified by the cancer registry and invited to participate in the trial if they were over 18, within ten months of diagnosis, English speaking and able to provide informed consent and considered able to participate by their clinician [14].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>