This Review further highlights the pressing need for the establishment of trauma registry systems to address this gap. While population level public health surveillance systems play a role in determining national health priorities, trauma registries represent a fundamental pillar of any well functioning trauma system by enabling the assessment of individual hospital performance in the treatment of the critically ill and MLN0128 system-wide performance through the examination of recognized Audit Filters [43,51,52]. Such

Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical assessments are particularly relevant in developing and expanding trauma systems [53]. Registry data has been utilized to build the evidence base that an integrated and systematic approach to trauma management is associated with a reduction in the incidence of preventable deaths, fewer complications, shorter length of stay and improved functional outcomes [37-42,54-56]. The reviewed studies demonstrate the feasibility of establishing Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical a registry system and as Wang et al [1] note ‘China has the financial resources, organisational infrastructure, and public support to rapidly apply lessons from high income countries to achieve international best-practice Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical standards for injury prevention and control…’ (p.7). China has both an opportunity and a need to establish a trauma registry

system consistent with international standards of core data [9,13-16] with appropriate site specific additions to Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical capture nuances of the health system. Inclusion of these core data points would overcome the limitations in the reporting – and hence comparability, of the studies reviewed here. In addition to performance monitoring and quality control, the ability of trauma registry data to be used to identify injury trends, evaluate public health interventions and provide the basis for capacity

building in terms of academic research, educational opportunities and the conduct of clinical trials is significant. Conclusions This Review of Chinese-language Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical injury surveillance studies demonstrates that a significant body of hospital-based injury surveillance research has been undertaken in China. These studies were generally before impressive in their respective sample sizes and while the majority were prospective collaborative studies, there was a lack of uniformity in reporting key data points. Moreover, none of the studies reported patient data using internationally accepted indices of injury severity. With the incidence of injury in China increasing, commentators have called for the implementation of injury surveillance systems that utilise internationally recognised coding schemes to guide population based public health priority setting. This Review supports these calls.