This allows us to compare the dependence of the binding energies on the wrapping angle for two cases—with free and fixed DNA ends. The binding energy, that is, the strength of the interaction between the ssDNA and the tube, is calculated as the difference

between the total energies of the optimized CNT-DNA hybrid, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical the optimized bare CNT, and the optimized isolated DNA molecule. To find the optimized geometry of an isolated ssDNA, the DNA configuration obtained from the optimization of the CNT-DNA hybrid geometry and subsequent removal of all the CNT atoms is used as an initial approximation for the force field energy optimization. Finally, the optimized DNA configuration with the smallest total energy is

chosen as the final configuration of the isolated DNA molecule. All geometrical optimizations are performed by means of the HyperChem software package [34] using the CHARM27 force field Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical approach [35, 36] and an energy convergence limit of 0.001KCal/(Åmol). Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 4. Experimental Results A characteristic STM image of the CNT-DNA sample is shown in Figure 2(a). The DNA-covered parts of the nanotube are visible as large island-like protrusions on a flat substrate surface. Three notable features of the samples are evident in Figure 2(a). First, all observed islands have similar structure. This suggests that either we are able Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical to resolve the structure of only one type of CNT-DNA hybrids or else hybrids consisting of different SWNT types have the same geometry. However, the latter assumption contradicts previous experimental [16, 18, 28, 37] and theoretical [17, 25, 28, 38] results that demonstrated strong dependence of the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical DNA wrapping geometry on CNT chirality. Therefore, we conclude that only one type of CNT-DNA sample is observable due to the selectivity of the DNA wrapping with respect to the tube chirality. Second, there are no uncovered ends of SWNTs visible in the image as one might expect

from the length differences between a typical SWNT (~100′s of nm) and 20-mer ssDNA. This discrepancy can be explained by the Vemurafenib supplier sonication step in the sample preparation procedure [18]. Previously, it was found that thorough sonication leads to multiple nanotube breakages resulting in significant nanotube length reduction [17]. In our case, DNA-covered see more segments serve as fortified islands along the nanotube length, causing the breaks to occur at the edges of such regions and leaving only short, 10–15nm, fragments of the original SWNT for observation. This suggests that the length of the CNT-DNA hybrids can be controlled with some degree of precision by varying the length of the ssDNA-covered segments and subsequent thorough sonication. This observation might be important for medicinal application of these materials.