The simple design of this study lends itself to being reproduced easily, allowing the comparability of clinical data across different countries and clinical settings. The most important benefit in using the BC criteria for the confirmation of aseptic meningitis cases lies in the combination of clinical symptoms with key laboratory findings. The typical clinical signs and symptoms of meningitis are not always present  and are particularly
nonspecific in neonates and infants  and . Neck stiffness or nuchal rigidity (used synonymously with “Meningismus” in German) are estimated to be present in only 39–53% of patients ,  and . As indicated selleck inhibitor above, negative gram stains and culture results are required to rule out bacterial meningitis. Applying the BC criteria demands both clinical and laboratory evidence therefore preventing premature conclusions based on clinical signs and symptoms or laboratory values alone. Reversely, the lessons learnt in this study are suggestive of several modifications to the BC definitions which may further improve the applicability of these useful research tools: First, newborns and pediatric patients
with evidence of bacterial sepsis such as positive peripheral blood cultures and signs of systemic illness, are often also treated for presumed (bacterial) meningitis . An additional rule or footnote specific to this age group should further improve the specificity of the ASM definition.
Entinostat mw Furthermore, cases of abscess, ventriculitis, or shunt infection may present with negative CSF cultures and could be misclassified as aseptic meningitis according to the BC definitions. Cases with any evidence of abscess, ventriculitis, or foreign bodies in the CNS, either clinically Sodium butyrate or by neuroimaging, should be excluded from the Brighton Collaboration case definition for aseptic meningitis. Cerebellitis, tumors, cerebral tuberculosis, neuroborelliosis, monoradiculitis, chronic disseminated encephalomyelitis , Bell’s Palsy and Guillain Barré syndrome seem to fall into separate categories and their role in relation to the existing BC case definitions should be clarified. New case definitions for Guillain Barré synrome  and Bell’s Palsy as an AEFI  are in development and will be complementary to and compatible with the existing definitions. In conclusion, Brighton Collaboration definitions are easily applicable in clinical settings. Once cases have been defined and assessed uniformly, possible causes and triggers of such clinical events can be investigated while avoiding selection bias. The results of this study will be compatible to any other site using the same Brighton Collaboration definitions. A systematic approach to the diagnosis of meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis, and ADEM is urgently needed.